- Introduced tests for ContainerStatusAggregator to validate status aggregation logic across various container states.
- Implemented tests to ensure serverStatus accessor correctly checks server infrastructure health without being affected by container status.
- Updated ExcludeFromHealthCheckTest to verify excluded status handling in various components.
- Removed obsolete PushServerUpdateJobStatusAggregationTest as its functionality is covered elsewhere.
- Updated version number for sentinel to 0.0.17 in versions.json.
Added comprehensive logging to track why applicationContainerStatuses
collection is empty in PushServerUpdateJob.
## Logging Added
### 1. Raw Sentinel Data (line 113-118)
**Logs**: Complete container data received from Sentinel
**Purpose**: See exactly what Sentinel is sending
**Data**: Container count and full container array with all labels
### 2. Container Processing Loop (line 157-163)
**Logs**: Every container as it's being processed
**Purpose**: Track which containers enter the processing loop
**Data**: Container name, status, all labels, coolify.managed flag
### 3. Skipped Containers - Not Managed (line 165-171)
**Logs**: Containers without coolify.managed label
**Purpose**: Identify containers being filtered out early
**Data**: Container name
### 4. Successful Container Addition (line 193-198)
**Logs**: When container is successfully added to applicationContainerStatuses
**Purpose**: Confirm containers ARE being processed
**Data**: Application ID, container name, container status
### 5. Missing com.docker.compose.service Label (line 200-206)
**Logs**: Containers skipped due to missing com.docker.compose.service
**Purpose**: Identify the most likely root cause
**Data**: Container name, application ID, all labels
## Why This Matters
User reported applicationContainerStatuses is empty (`[]`) even though
Sentinel is pushing updates. This logging will reveal:
1. Is Sentinel sending containers at all?
2. Are containers filtered by coolify.managed check?
3. Is com.docker.compose.service label missing? (most likely)
4. What labels IS Sentinel actually sending?
## Expected Findings
Based on investigation, the issue is likely:
- Sentinel is NOT sending com.docker.compose.service in labels
- Or Sentinel uses a different label format/name
- Containers pass all other checks but fail on line 190-206
## Next Steps
After logs appear, we'll see exactly which filter is blocking containers
and can fix the root cause (likely need to extract com.docker.compose.service
from container name or use a different label source).
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Implemented endpoints to update and delete GitHub apps in the GithubController.
- Added OpenAPI annotations for the new endpoints, including request and response specifications.
- Removed the 'is_public' field from the app creation and update processes, defaulting it to false.
- Enhanced validation for update requests to ensure proper data handling.
- Implemented a new GithubController with endpoints to create GitHub apps, load repositories, and fetch branches for a given repository.
- Added OpenAPI annotations for API documentation.
- Included validation for incoming requests and error handling for various scenarios.
- Refactored backup configuration retrieval and update logic to use UUIDs instead of IDs.
- Added new endpoint to list backup executions for a specific backup configuration.
- Improved error handling and validation for backup operations.
- Updated API documentation to reflect changes in parameter names and descriptions.
Add separate API to create services with custom Docker compose instead
of oneclick services implement as a POST to /services/compose.
This is somewhat similar to /applications/dockercompose but that API is
the only one in ApplicationsController that actually works with the `Service` model.
- Removed the temporary unavailability message from the /sentinel/push route to allow for proper handling of authorization without misleading responses.
- This change improves the clarity of the API response when the authorization token is not provided.
- Introduced `environment_uuid` as a required field in various API endpoints and schemas.
- Updated descriptions to clarify that either `environment_name` or `environment_uuid` must be provided.
- Modified routes and controller methods to accommodate the new UUID parameter.
- Adjusted frontend components to utilize `environment_uuid` for better consistency and clarity.
- Removed deprecated fields related to environment handling.
This change enhances the API's flexibility in identifying environments, improving overall usability.
